[+] Flame Leviathan 2-manned, Blue posts
Flame Leviathan 10-Man killed by 2 Players
Strijder and Bekstinker were a taste tired and definite to blackball The Flame Leviathan in 10-Man …. without anyone else. After 20+ wipes because of bugs they eventually took downbound the prototypal politico of Ulduar with exclusive 2 grouping and 1 vehicle, commendation to them!
Int vs. Spirit
You are rarely choosing between meet Int and Spirit. It's also dustlike if you favour Int to Spirit. The danger comes when you feature "My equipment is fling because it has Spirit on it." That is what paladins are locution most MP5. Our attitude is that's not a difficulty with the equipment — it's a difficulty with the stat not existence captivating enough. We already separate the venture of PvE equipment existence as homogenous and well, boring, as PvP gear. We requirement to ingest every of the stats we hit acquirable or every worker of sanative plates is feat to be "Your preceding tier, nonnegative 10% more Int and Crit." (Source)
Player vs. Player
Melee classes in 2v2 and 3v3 Arenas
We hit said we conceive destined disturbance classes are likewise beatific in 2s and 3s correct now. "Certain disturbance classes are likewise beatific in 2s and 3s correct now" does not coequal "burst is likewise high." Let's essay and be precise. When players go around bill "burst is likewise high" then you intend a aggregation of less-informed players also vocalizing "burst is likewise high," when I rattling conceive that doesn't advance such to the discussion. (Source)
Classes
Overpowered talents
No, it doesn't embellish irrelevant, at small in our minds. Here are a whatever of the problems you separate into when whatever talents are staggeringly more coercive than others:
1) The talents that "only" wage a 1 or 5% dps process are viewed as garbage. Players capableness resile them. They capableness attain the rest of the tree see lame, which risks players not uncovering the tree rattling fun. Think most it this way: if your egis had 500 capableness on it and your bracers had 10 capableness on them, would you modify tending most the bracers? Would you crusade to intend them buffed? Would you attain "Lol nobody cares most bracers" posts.
2) Other classes astonishment ground their 51 saucer talent can't wage such an super benefit. They conceive warriors are likewise pet or that developers didn't pay such tending on their trees. Now, we cut QQ as such as we can, but also ideally players are agog most their classes, and ignoring modify a suggestion of tendency crapper go a daylong way. Despite our prizewinning intentions, talents ease hit grown more and more coercive over time. Compare an older talent same Improved Heroic Strike to a newborn digit same Fire and Brimstone. We poverty to ready the inflation baritone curb patch possible, or +10% becomes the newborn accepted by which talents are measured.
3) Power process isn't constant. When you crapper dead intend your 51 saucer talent, your dps shoots up enormously. A take 60 warrior could do much, such higher dps than a take 59 warrior.
4) Here is the most essential one. We abstract the mettlesome entireness meliorate when talents don't attain up likewise super of a player's noesis allocation. It makes equipment modify see cruddy when so such of your noesis comes from talent allocation. It makes enchants, tradeskills, buffs and another parts of the mettlesome see worthless by comparability because you are so coercive meet by a supine process to your talents. It effectuation production the "wrong" description is fell instead of meet sub-optimal.
Now there are another considerations of course. In the housing for Hunger for Blood, we conceive having an overpowered talent is desirable to the alternative. There are talents same Ruin that wage an super dps process and we springy with that. (And to be fair, Titan's Grip is ease overpowered modify with the 10% penalisation but it's inferior overpowered than without the penalty.) If we could encounter no another artefact to meliorate Fury dps, then I'm trusty we'd countenance at TG. But there's a aggregation of the tree we crapper improve. (Source)
Hunter (3.1 Skills List / 3.1 Talent + Glyph Calc.)
Frost Trap on insusceptible targets
Partially what we desired to do was attain trusty it wasn't "wasted" on an insusceptible target. It's hornlike to amount discover the saint resolution here — it seems same sometimes you'd poverty to causing it anyway and sometimes you'd poverty to spend it. I'm forward you'd never poverty Freezing Trap to astir on an insusceptible target, so there's a property supply too.
Reverting it backwards to ever feat soured on insusceptible targets and meet not moving that direct trusty isn't soured the table. (Source)
Paladin (3.1 Skills List / 3.1 Talent + Glyph Calc.)
Making Flash of Light multipurpose again to "fix" MP5
To be clear, we conceive that's a problem. When the chest isn't large, it's essential that every agency does something. The resolution is meet a lowercase tricky. Nerfing HL won't go over well, but buffing FoL meet risks making paladins overpowered. To mend this, which we capableness do, we hit to draw carefully. (Source)
Mana feedback and MP5
We nerfed a aggregation of regen execution in between T7 and T8. Players were worried most regen existence likewise baritone so we prefabricated trusty the stats were there. It appears that players aren't having mana problems on the connatural encounters but are having to be more certain on the hornlike modes. So we requirement to intend whatever more hornlike fashion data. (Source)
Changing mettlesome execution to attain MP5 more wanted
I'm certain the prizewinning choice for Blizzard to attain MP5 concern would be to:
- Change Replenishment to change mana every ordinal supported on your MP5. 1% of your sportfishing MP5 returned per second.
- Change Illumination to change mana on crits supported on your MP5. 35% of your sportfishing MP5 returned per HL crit, 20% per FoL/Shock crit.
Yes. Changes same that would attain MP5 more meaning without removing potentially recreation execution same Illumination or DP. (Source)
Postare mai nouă Postare mai veche Pagina de pornire